Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 04:56
What’s next?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Accidental find in planetarium show could shift scientists’ understanding of our solar system - CNN
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Feeling antsy in your legs at bedtime? This condition may be to blame - CNN
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Why is Harley-Davidson dropping diversity initiatives after the right-wing anti-DEI campaign?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sit deserunt in iusto aut praesentium fugiat fugit.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
With Quantum Entanglement And Blockchain, We Can Finally Generate Real Random Numbers - IFLScience
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Why do old men think young women and girls would want them over guys their own age?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Thank you.
Panthers' winning formula goes missing in Stanley Cup Final Game 1 loss to Oilers - NHL.com